<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second reef to fight erosion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/2008/10/20/second-reef-to-fight-erosion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/2008/10/20/second-reef-to-fight-erosion/</link>
	<description>Europe&#039;s First Artificial Surf Reef in Boscombe (Bournemouth) Dorset</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/2008/10/20/second-reef-to-fight-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/?p=285#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Well I must admit Justin as I&#039;m not local I wouldn&#039;t know on that score. I&#039;m presuming if Boscombe gets swell then Southbourne probably gets some as well, but I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I must admit Justin as I&#8217;m not local I wouldn&#8217;t know on that score. I&#8217;m presuming if Boscombe gets swell then Southbourne probably gets some as well, but I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/2008/10/20/second-reef-to-fight-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/?p=285#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I think for this to be a successful surfing option, one primary element is missing...

You might need swell as well as the reef????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for this to be a successful surfing option, one primary element is missing&#8230;</p>
<p>You might need swell as well as the reef????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/2008/10/20/second-reef-to-fight-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bournemouthsurfreef.com/?p=285#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Often the ones designed for erosion don&#039;t provide good surf.

However, the ones designed for surf are supposed to also prevent erosion.

If the council were to go for a second reef, if the 1st one works, they&#039;d be better off going for a surf reef in my opinion as then they have the best of both worlds and yet another tourism attraction / draw for investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often the ones designed for erosion don&#8217;t provide good surf.</p>
<p>However, the ones designed for surf are supposed to also prevent erosion.</p>
<p>If the council were to go for a second reef, if the 1st one works, they&#8217;d be better off going for a surf reef in my opinion as then they have the best of both worlds and yet another tourism attraction / draw for investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
